
The triple bottom line concept moves ESG and CSR considerations into the spotlight. When organizations adopt a triple bottom line, evaluating corporate performance becomes not just about finances but also about your impact on the planet and its inhabitants.
As important as this shift is, it can be challenging to make a business case for what can feel like a drastic shift in operations. To help prepare you and your organization for the triple bottom line, this article will explain:
The triple bottom line (TBL) approach is the belief that companies should focus on social and environmental concerns as much as they do on profit.
The term triple bottom line was coined in 1994 by corporate responsibility strategist John Elkington. Explaining its origins, Elkington commented that there was no ‘eureka moment,’ but instead, the term came out of a search for a ‘new language to express what we saw as an inevitable expansion of the environmental agenda.’
In the late 1990s, as the need for corporate social responsibility grew more widely recognized and environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations became more deeply embedded in corporate strategy, the use of triple bottom line to describe organizations' obligation to consider social and environmental issues really took off. The triple bottom line and corporate social responsibility are closely interlinked, as is ESG.
The triple bottom line framework is also commonly referred to as the 3Ps, TBL, or 3BL because it advocates that instead of one bottom line focusing on profit, companies should have three:
It’s important to note that the triple bottom line doesn’t prioritize environmental and social concerns over profit. In fact, it suggests that all three ‘p’s of people, the planet and profit are interwoven. It has been shown that a focus on sustainability, ethics and business integrity can enhance corporate performance rather than coming at its expense.
The first P, profit, refers to the traditional bottom line: how much money an organization makes. In the triple bottom line, though, profit is understood in the context of the other two Ps. This challenges organizations to ask themselves: How can I maximize profit without compromising people or planet?
When organizations think of people, they often think of their employees. While the triple bottom line framework does concern itself with workplace health, safety and diversity, it also looks at the impact organizations have on the communities in which they operate.
The third P, planet, holds organizations accountable for their environmental impact. This includes everything from the water and power they use at their corporate offices to the greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and waste generated at their factories.
Today’s business landscape increasingly values non-financial metrics. Climate change is imperative, with reporting frameworks like the TCFD making businesses and their directors more publicly accountable.
It’s essential for all organizations to address ESG. Net zero isn’t some far-off concept; it is something companies of all sizes need to start working toward — today. — Chief Executive Officer, Diligent Corporation, Brian Stafford
The triple bottom line concept dovetails this trend, capturing the need to recognize, measure and report on business performance beyond the purely financial.
“It’s essential for all organizations to address ESG. Net zero isn’t some far-off concept; it is something companies of all sizes need to start working toward — today,” says Diligent Corporation Chief Executive Officer Brian Stafford.
This importance is underscored as ESG reporting moves into the mainstream and potential shareholders increasingly using ESG ratings to assess possible investments.
Putting people and the planet at the heart of your business, on par with profits, isn’t just the right thing to do from a business integrity perspective. There are also sound business benefits to the triple-bottom-line approach. Focusing on people and the planet can:
Some of the world's biggest companies, including Apple, General Electric and Procter & Gamble, have embraced the concept of aligning their CSR and ESG efforts with their profit. It’s both proof of the importance of the triple bottom line and that high profits are still possible when you balance your impact with your revenue.
In recent years, John Elkington has expressed a desire to “recall” the 3BL concept. Not because he believes it is no longer relevant, but quite the opposite — because the issues it covers are more important than ever, but the concept has shifted away from its original intentions.
While the triple bottom line model has arguably been the basis for many accounting and reporting frameworks, such as Social Return on Investment (SROI), Elkington designed it to be more than an accounting tool. In his words, “it was supposed to provoke deeper thinking about capitalism and its future, but many early adopters understood the concept as a balancing act, adopting a trade-off mentality.”
Regarding the triple bottom line, Elkington says, "It is time to either step up — or to get out of the way.” In other words, organizations need to commit to ESG leadership or abandon the concept.
While the debate regarding the future of the concept continues, many businesses will continue to give priority to the triple bottom line. So, what are the practical steps companies can take to operationalize 3BL?
Triple bottom line doesn’t happen overnight. Even if another similar organization uses a 3BL approach, it’s important to remember that every business is unique — so how you approach 3BL should be, too.
“The framework or pillars your organization decides to set as the foundation for its ESG program will be based on what is most important to you,” says Diligent Director of ESG & Sustainability, Faiza Asifuddin. “These key focal points will allow you not only to define your ESG strategy but to set actions on the pathway to achieving your goals.”
With that in mind, here are some critical steps Asifuddin recommends for organizations who want to adopt a triple-bottom-line approach:
Remember, implementing triple bottom line is a marathon, not a sprint. It might take a year or longer for your program to run effectively, but that time will be well spent securing your organization’s future. “ESG is becoming increasingly more visible and important not just to investors but to all stakeholders — from communities to employees to consumers,” Asifudden says. “It can seem overwhelming at first but starting early and starting small is critical to success and having the right tools at your disposal make it that much easier.”
There’s no shortage of books, articles and other resources on corporate social responsibility and related topics. And yet, many businesses struggle to build an ESG strategy based on agreed metrics and consistent triple bottom line reporting. Here’s why:
The mistake I’ve seen a lot of companies make is that they wait until they have a critical mass of data and information that’s completely unwieldly and badly stored in systems that aren’t designed for ESG tracking. They then find themselves in a scramble to find a solution. — Director of ESG & Sustainability, Diligent Corporation, Faiza Asifuddin
This is where ESG solutions can help. When users have access to up-to-date information on ESG standards and expectations across geographies, it can expedite your understanding of your baseline and make it easier to set measurable objectives.
Access to governance data enables you to identify discrepancies in your own performance on issues like diversity, governance and executive pay. Meanwhile, built-in governance intelligence allows users to keep track of ESG trends, regulations and stakeholder sentiment to inform goal-setting and drive strategic decisions. ESG is more important than ever. Yet far too few organizations have explored how integrating technology with their ESG efforts can help meet shareholder and consumer expectations.
Technology unlocks new possibilities for ESG. It makes sustainability not only easier to achieve but easier to defend. After all, what’s a good ESG program if you can’t report on your success to the stakeholders that matter?
Learn more about ESG technology and how it can help you leverage the triple bottom line.
_________________________
There are three factors that make up the triple bottom line: profits, people and planet. These factors encourage businesses to equally weigh their financial, social and environmental impacts when evaluating their performance.
There are many advantages to the triple-bottom-line approach, including:
CSR is central to the triple bottom line. CSR, or corporate social responsibility, holds organizations accountable for the social impacts of their actions. This aligns well with triple-bottom-line priorities, which call for organizations to measure their performance in light of their impacts on people and planet. Companies that take CSR seriously usually have a solid approach to triple bottom line.