
With the COP26 summit in motion, and the UN reporting a “code red” for global warming, the pressure on businesses to address climate change is intensifying. Against this background, the G7 recently called for the world to become nature positive. But what does it mean? How does it differ from, and interplay with, other objectives like net-zero? Crucially, how can businesses make it mean something tangible — not just words on your ESG mission statement?
What does nature positive mean? According to the World Economic Forum, it means “enhancing the resilience of our planet and societies to halt and reverse nature loss.”
Nature positive isn’t the only term used to describe climate-focused activity. We also hear carbon-neutral, net-zero and carbon or corporate footprint. How is nature positive different? The World Economic Forum believes it “represents a real paradigm shift in how nations, businesses, investors and consumers view nature.” Rather than doing simply “less harm,” individuals and businesses are being exhorted to impact nature positively, enhancing ecosystems rather than settling for damage limitation.
Nature positive as an aspiration is gaining traction and garnering headlines. In their recent announcement, G7 leaders announced that “our world must not only become net zero, but also nature positive, for the benefit of both people and the planet.” This sits against a backdrop of increased focus on all aspects of environmental, social and governance (ESG) activity. This has some drivers:
The ascendancy of nature positive as a goal within this landscape has been accelerated by focus from public bodies. Alongside the G7 and World Economic Forum’s incitements to action, in the UK, the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) launched a report in September 2021, titled Nature Positive 2030. This challenges businesses to reverse biodiversity decline and become nature positive by 2030, putting a clear deadline on their efforts.
The World Economic Forum (WEF) has published a blueprint for businesses wishing to “transition to a nature-positive future.” This has valuable guidance for organizations wanting to understand and take steps towards being nature positive, including 15 transitions companies can make to halt nature loss by 2030. The WEF estimates that these 15 systemic transitions could generate up to $10.1 trillion in business value and 395 million jobs by 2030 — further evidence of the commercial benefits of a nature positive approach. Although transition risk is always a consideration when implementing any business change, the benefits of moving towards a nature positive approach hopefully outweigh any challenges in getting there.
It may be tempting to view nature positive as just another term in the ESG lexicon — but it has its own meaning and takes businesses a step beyond carbon neutral and net-zero. Having a positive impact on the environment has to be the natural extension of an ethical organization’s ESG strategy. If you want to make a real difference to the planet’s future, nature positive is the next logical step.
You can sign up here for our bi-weekly ESG newsletter to discover more pressing topics, stay abreast of industry news and regulations and hear from industry thought leaders.